Posts Tagged ‘myths’

Model Releases for Nude Photography: 10 Myths

There is quite a lot of information available on model releases, and there are quite a few people who are still confused about the topic. When it comes to nude photography there are some aspects that are not often talked about. many of the principles are exactly the same for nude and non-nude photography, but there are also differences. Many wiki sites and modeling forums have information, some of which is helpful, but some of which is misleading or flat-out wrong when applied to nude photos. There are a couple of good legal books for photographers that I recommend. These appear at the bottom of the post.

Luckily, it is not the norm to end up in a legal dispute regarding your nude photography. The worst thing that I have experienced is having a publisher delay acceptance of nudes until I could get a proper release signed by the model. But you can save yourself time and potential headaches by having a proper release for your images.

Myth #1 : I need a model release in order to legally take nude photos.
Response: Wrong. Model releases are about permission to use the photos, not permission to take them.

Myth #2: A model release protects my copyright.
Response: Wrong. A model release gives permission to use photos and has nothing to do with copyright.

Myth #3: I don’t need a model release if I shoot nudes in a public place such as the great outdoors.
Response: Yes, you do. This myth stems from fact that people in public places do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. However, a claim of invasion of privacy is not the only thing a model release protects you from. If the images are used for advertising, you need a release. If the use could in any way be construed as malicious or scandalous (not hard to image with nudes photos, especially years down the road) you have a problem. It’s best to be clear about what you intend to do with nude photos, so put it in writing. Shooting in public doesn’t mean you won’t want a release.

Myth #4: I have a first amendment right to distribute my photos so I don’t need a release.
Response: Your first amendment rights are not carte blanche to distribute nude photos when someone else might have a reasonable expectation of privacy, a right to portray others in a false light, etc. There is plenty more going on than first amendment rights when it comes to releases for nudes.

Myth #5: I don’t need a model release if I’m not making money off my photos.
Response: See myth #4, above. While it’s true that you can sell photos of people without their permission under some circumstances, there is more at play with nude photos. Even if you’re conducting a gallery show or displaying them on the Internet you could be subject to claims including painting the model in a false light if you didn’t establish intended uses clearly in writing.

Myth #6: A generic model release is fine for nude images.
Response: On the contrary, a model release for nude photographs should, at a minimum, state that the model is releasing nude images. This is especially important if any of the images look like they could have been an instance of the model mistakenly revealing more than intended. A good release contains a description of what is being released.

Myth #7: I only need to pay the model $1 or give her a copy of a photo to make the release enforceable.
Response: A compensation clause in a release is used to show that both parties have given “consideration”. This is one of the requirements for having a contract. If you do end up in a dispute, it doesn’t look good to have a payment that is well below market rates for services if you are in the business of selling the images. Inequitable compensation is a big red flag especially if the model has little experience and you have much. If the compensation clause is in question, the whole model release is in question. Pay fair rates.

Myth #8: If the model doesn’t read the release it’s not valid.
or
As long as she signs it, it is valid.
Response: Both of these are wrong. Most releases are written as contracts. If someone signs a contract without signing it, that fact alone does not invalidate the contract. It is up to everyone to read what they sign. However, just because someone signs something, doesn’t mean you have a contract. If you trick or pressure the model into signing without reading, you definitely don’t have a valid contract. So don’t rush the model and don’t try to fool her with long-winded verbiage in the release. If there is no meeting of the minds, there is no contract.

Myth #9: The release should be signed before the shoot begins.
Similar Myth: If I’ve already worked with a model and have a release, I don’t need a release for our second shoot.
Response: I can’t think of a good reason to do this and the practice could be very problematic when shooting nudes. Some photographers want to get the release out-of-the-way. If the model is inexperienced or has questions about what kind of permission and uses you’ll be asking for, you can show her the release before you shoot but don’t have her sign it. It’s difficult to enforce a model release that pertains to images that do not yet exist when the release is signed. Court cases involving model releases have been awarded based on the sole fact that it was not clear as to which specific photos were being released. The model could claim that she didn’t know the extent of nudity involved and thus there was no meeting of the minds and no binding contract. If the photos don’t yet exist, you don’t have a very solid release.

Myth #10: A model release provides the photographer better protection if it is long with lots of legal language, especially in the case of nudes.
Response: Just about the opposite is true. The release need only be long enough to clearly establish what the agreement is and to account for any contingencies. Unnecessarily complex or repetitive language can actually weaken a release. Remember, a contract documents an agreement and the more complicated the language the less plausible it is that both people were in agreement.

I assure you, I have a release for all my photos.

I assure you, I have a release for all my photos. Model: Tess I.

Disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer and laws vary by location. Enjoy the above generalizations, don’t fall for myths, and seek qualified experts for your legal questions.

You may enjoy reading:

The Law (in Plain English) for Photographers
by Leonard D. Duboff

and

Legal Handbook for Photographers
by Bert Krages

If you’d like to read more about model releases for nude photography, as well as the interpersonal aspects of working with models, you may enjoy my book Up to My Eyeballs in Nude Women. It covers recruiting models, preparing them for a shoot, getting great results in the studio, and a solid follow through (which includes, of course, an appropriate model release.) This book includes a sample model release that is like what I use.

 

 

 

 

Post to Twitter

When Cutting Limbs Works in Nude Photography

If you’ve read Internet forums about composition, you’ve undoubtedly seen advice “not to cut off the model’s arms or legs,” or “if you crop a limb, do it between the joints.” You’ve probably also seen in major magazines stunning examples of photos that blatantly violate these so-called rules. And you probably have stumbled upon at least one discussion that asks why these rules exist if so many successful photos obviously disobey them. If you look to works of master artists such as Michaelangelo or Degas you will see they sometimes framed their figures with limbs, hands, or feet cut off. Did the master artists goof? No, they just knew how to break the rules and make a successful composition. When done properly, it can make the composition more distinct and interesting.

The reason these rules exist is that they provide a structured framework for creating well balanced images. If you’ve read my other posts pertaining to “rules of composition,” you know I’m not a fan of static, safe images. Read more

Post to Twitter

Why You Don’t Have to Convince a Model to Pose Nude

Nude model - Charleston SCI’m often asked how I convince so many women to pose nude. The answer is: “I don’t.” There is no need to. The women I photograph are willing to pose nude before they even know I exist. The first nude shoot I did was a total surprise to me. The model just took her clothes off and stepped in front of my camera, ready to model. She just assumed I wanted to photograph her nude.

The fact is, plenty of women want to pose nude for photographers, so you don’t have to convince them to. Not only have a photographed plenty of nude models, but they’ve shared with me their reasons for choosing who they pose for.

Nudes by the numbers

Let’s take the following for example… Read more

Post to Twitter

Top 10 Nude Modeling Myths

  1. Myth: To become a model you first need to pay a photographer.
    Reality:
    There are a lot of scams out there. Modeling is a job you get paid to do; if you have to pay, you’re not modeling. No major modeling agency requires that you hire a photographer before interviewing and they state this on their web sites.
  2. Myth: Modeling is easy glamorous work.
    Reality:
    Modeling can be fun, but it requires effort.
  3. Myth: Anyone can be a model, it doesn’t may if you’re young or old, skinny or fat.
    Reality:
    Modeling is competitive — you need to look better than the competition or you won’t get the work. True their are lifestyle models and plus sized models, but these fields are no less competitive.
  4. Myth: You have to look like a runway model to find work.
    Reality:
    Not all modeling is runway modeling; print models under 5′8″ appear all the time in pin up and nude shots in Playboy, on posters, advertisements, etc.
  5. Myth: Models have to be skinny.
    Reality:
    Models need to be healthy, if you’re doing glamour or nude modeling some curves are helpful.
  6. Myth: Models are dumb.
    Reality:
    Successful models are smart. Dumb models don’t get work — modeling is competitive and smart models know they have to exercise, eat right, and get as much practice as possible.
  7. Myth: You need to take a class to learn to model.
    Reality:
    You can shell out a ton of money on modeling schools (or scams) and it won’t help you as much as getting real experience or advice from experts.
  8. Myth: Models shouldn’t smile in photos, the expressions should always be blank.
    Reality:
    Sometimes a smile is called for, sometimes it’s not. Being able to show a range of expressions and moods is important.
  9. Myth: Modeling is like what you see on reality TV.
    Reality:
    Get real!
  10. Myth: Always look right at the camera.
    Reality:
    A variety of looks and poses is better.

Post to Twitter

Return top

Return to the main site: