Archive for August, 2010

How I Build A Nude Image

Here is my list of priorities in building a nude image. These are specific to me, and vary widely based on individual photographers. However there are many photographers with a similar background to mine that follow this general hierarchy of steps for building an image. I have a parent who is an artist, an older sibling who is a university art professor, and I have an art degree where I studied more than just photography. I grew up overseas and have been to museums in dozens of countries. Since my exposure to art, from childhood through college as been mainly non-photographic art, it has influenced my thinking on building an image.

#1: Composition. Any image is perceived by viewers as an abstract composition first. Before you can process what an image is (context) you see how it is composed. We’re hard wired to do this, and it’s not just my opinion. Without a solid composition, the viewer’s attention will go elsewhere quickly. Quick test: convert your image to black and white and reduce it to about 200 pixels wide, if it’s a strong composition it will still look interesting.

#2. Context (mood): What is the image about? Context tells you what the mood of the image is, not necessarily a story (context is the what not the how). The mood is not always beauty, sometimes an image can be intentionally jarring to communicate the context.

#3. Beauty. Context and content can feed into beauty, but do not have to. Beauty can be flattering to the subject in traditional ways, but is more about intriguing the viewer — sometimes with an unusual approach. Don’t underestimate the power of beauty; my mediocre shots of extremely beautiful models win more appreciation that the most meticulous shot of a just slightly beautiful model. Capitalize on the innate beauty of your subject, don’t try to put her in the role of something she’s not.

#4. Illustration. I’m not talking about pen and ink here, but story telling through images. This is not essential to a good nude photo, but most good nudes tell some sort of a story. Not surprisingly, the story is often somewhat ambiguous and thus open to interpretation.

#5. Technical aspects. A favorite Ansel Adems quote goes “Nothing is worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept.” I’m not saying that technique isn’t important. It is very important, but it comes after good form. A poorly executed image can be distracting and sabotage a good concept.

Just following the above, doesn’t make an image successful. Nor am I recommending anyone could use this as a recipe for success. This is food for thought, an insight into my process.

Post to Twitter

Lauren, ironing in the nude

Model: Lauren

Background paper: thunder grey

Light 1: striplight (17×58”) 300 WS; camera right, slightly behind model

Light 2: 24×24 softbox with grid, camera left, 300 WS

Light 3: 7” reflector, sock, grid; 150 WS, camera left; 9 feet high, behind pointed back and down at model

Light 4: 7” reflector, sock, grid; 150 WS, 3 feet high, behind model, pointed at leg

In the second shot I think the camera angle works better. I also like the angle of her head better. I wanted thing all leading you towards the iron (hard to do when there is a beautiful nude to look at.) I think I need to find a larger and more colorful iron to make this shot sufficiently quirky. I also would have liked to have wrapped the cord around the leg a few times to make it a design element where it crosses the leg.

Post to Twitter

A Couple Photos of Mica


Read more

Post to Twitter

Water nude (Model: Sarah a.k.a. Venus)

Info on this photo:

Set
Model is in approx. 8 inches of water, in a 5×10 foot inflatable pool, lined with 3.5 mil black plastic. A running hose is suspended 12 inches above the water to create ripples, and it was lightly raining.

2 Light Heads
#1, 300WS Novatron with white umbrella opposite camera (pointing towards camera) at 45 degree angle. 10 feet from model, 8 feet high; flagged by French door frame.
#2 300 WS Novatron to right of model, sock diffuser, pointing down and slightly towards camera. 6 feet from model, 6 feet high.

Exposure
1/125s @ f7.1, focal length 52mm
Distance to model, approx 8 feet

Post Processing
Vignette added, contrast (levels) adjustment, selective color correction to water, cloning out of some debris. Rounding corner of flag.

Comments & Critiques
Comments and critiques accepted from all. (If you are also shooting similar work, a link to your photos is helpful when digesting comments.)

Post to Twitter

Return top

Return to the main site: